0
Digg me

I was at Deloitte’s TMT Prediction 2010 launch event yesterday morning at the Fairmont – The Queen Elizabeth Hotel. Here is a recap of the event and some thought on the predictions and the discussions we had during the event, including Google and Twitter. I’ll also write about Twitter and try to convince Duncan Stewart, the Director of Deloitte Canada Research: Technology, Media & Telecommunications, Life Sciences and GreenTech of why Twitter is a force to be reckoned with and is here to stay. In fact, by the time I finish this post, I have the intention of convincing any Business, Finance, Technology, Media or Telecommunication person reading it of the high value there is in following me, reading my blog and working with me for Business and Web Strategy, Industry and Business Analysis.

Winning the MyTMT Prediction 2010

This time around, Deloitte actually launched a competition called MyTMT prediction, opening it to the public. I was glad to be in the five finalists and also learn during the event that I won the competition with my prediction that Google is poised to massively disrupt the traditional Telecom Industry, to the applause of approximately 200 Business and Media people during the launch event yesterday, January 19th in Montreal.

Business Strategy

Many people have asked me what the prize was. It was recognition, from the Jury, from a big consulting firm like Deloitte and also many people in the Technology, Media and Telecommunication industries. I also won exposure, mingling with like-minded people, and participating in the conversation about foreseeing and predicting where Technology is bringing us and how it impacts our Businesses and lives. As Deloitte themselves argue, the value of the Predictions event is to

explore emerging trends that will have an impact on Canadian businesses in 2010.

and to

helping their clients evaluate complex issues, develop fresh approaches to problems, and implement practical solutions.

There are dedicated TMT practices in 45 countries in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. DTT’s member firms serve 92 percent of the TMT companies in the Fortune Global 500. Clients of Deloitte’s member firms’ TMT practices include some of the world’s top software companies, computer manufacturers, semiconductor foundries, wireless operators, cable companies, advertising agencies, and publishers.

About the research
The 2010 series of Predictions has drawn on internal and external inputs including: conversations with TMT companies, contributions from DTT member firms’ 7,000 partners and senior practitioners specializing in TMT, discussions with financial and industry analysts, and conversations with trade bodies.

Being able to foresee where things are going allows strategizing, planning for the long run. Being able to monitor things allow for swift changing of Business tactics so that the changing environment can have less deleterious effects.

This is why Deloitte’s TMT Predictions 2010 is essential reading:

  • Technology Predictions 2010
  • Media Predictions 2010
  • Telecommunications 2010
  • Similarly, somebody reading my blog back then in 2005 would have already known the pitfalls of using Microsoft’s Internet Explorer based on quasi-prophetic words at the time, totally vindicated by the recent huge security debacle involving Microsoft, Google, China, and some other 30-odd U.S. firms this January:

    During and after these brushes with Justice, Microsoft officials have repeatedly been heard chanting the mantra “Innovation, Innovation. If Microsoft is broken into smaller pieces, we won’t be able to do our Innovation.”

    But see, before all this, by bundling their inferior Internet Explorer with Windows, they still managed to make IE the most used browser on the planet since they also force Windows down the throat of the PC-buying customer.

    But once they achieved this, what do you think they did with IE? Do you think they kept on innovating, adding features to it, sorting out the kinks, supporting Internet Standards?

    No, they sat on it for 3 years. And since IE is a security hazard, the flaws were rapidly exploited. Last year, there were countless storied of PCs being hijacked by spyware, popups everywhere, people tearing their hair off, going mad.

    All of this because Microsoft in intent on dominating a segment but does not really care about the customer, nor about innovation. And once they do, and every time a finger points at them, they will strive to cover everything up in marketing or P.R.

    Not only that, but the Mozilla team, true to Open Source spirit, regularly updated the browser. More specifically, they patched any flaw very rapidly.

    Typically, Microsoft will take weeks before even acknowledging a flaw, and if they patch it, the user is left with a vulnerable system for months.

    Internet Explorer 7 will still be flawed. The problem is Microsoft.

    MS’s IE7 will still be flawed. Microsoft still hasn’t learned to support open standards and they still haven’t learned to released a secure software. Instead they are still rushing bug-ridden software and covering it up with P.R. and marketing millions, the latest case being Visual Studio 2005.

    Then they also want you to get their Windows Defender anti-spyware software. How come they cannot patch their faulty software first and foremost?

    Microsoft hasn’t learned and won’t learn from its mistakes. It’s a monopoly and feels safe enough there. So it will rely on weird tactics for a long time. Like removing all trace of some Linux-bashing articles from the Internet. Like funding pseudo-neutral analysts to tout their software and bash alternatives. Like spreading Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt about alternate products. Like enabling only passport-registered people to post comments on their inane MS-marketing blogs. And who posts there? Well those who have MS passports, that is, MS employees primarily and who will do some mutual back-slapping hoping the community takes it up (astro-turfing – a fake grass root marketing approach). Like stubbornly not supporting Open Standards. Like pissing off customers, partners, and employees all at once. Like creating an artificial shortage of XBox 360.

    The choice is yours. Make the best one.

    You have the choice to try an alternative: the best browser in the world.

    Microsoft has been at it again: trying to minimize the seriousness of the security issues, while bashing other browsers. The Web, however, is quick to point out the flawed reasoning:

    Mashable – Microsoft downplays Internet Explorer security holes

    It takes years to change an ingrained company culture with blessings of wrongdoing from above, and knowing the software engineering advantages of open-source (“With enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow” – Eric S. Raymond), I knew there were fundamental problems with the company itself.

    My point of view is validated today with entire governments like France and Germany saying no to Internet Explorer and urging to do the same, but only with 4 years of delay…

    So, if you would like to know what I think of where the future in Business and Technology lies, here are the essential posts you should read:

  • Revisiting past predictions – 2009
  • The essence of Google’s Success
  • Google Telecom, Hello!
  • Top 9 reasons why the Google Nexus One beats the iPhone
  • The Apple tablet and other industry disruptions signed Apple
  • Clash of the Titans – Google vs Apple in 2010 and beyond. That one was a whole two weeks before the nice BusinessWeek article.
  • And more predictions from me are here:

  • Technologies to watch for us 2010 and this decade
  • 10 Science, Business and Technology Predictions for the next decade 2010-2019
  • Predictions discussion

    a. Google

    After the presentation of my prediction, Duncan Stewart said “You nailed it. I think for everything, you nailed it. But I don’t agree with one thing”.

    And that was about how in the US, people are very used to a certain level of customer service. He does have a point, especially judging by the flood of questions and complaints regarding an issue with continuous switching between Edge and 3G networks. This got the Google-T-Mobile-HTC trinity passing a hot potato around for a while.

    Personally, I think it’s just growing pains for Google, but the bases of the innovative disruption are already there and the consumer will like that.

    Check out this very insightful text by Jon Stokes on Ars Technica where he describes how selling the handset unlocked and separately from the carrier changes the competitive landscape:

    Because AT&T has ensnared—and locked in—legions of consumers with the iPhone, the company’s incentive is to minimize their infrastructure spending so that they can maximize per-user profits. AT&T also has a motive to nickel-and-dime you to death, because it has you locked in with that amazing phone and its accompanying ETF.

    b. Twitter

    Asked by Michelle Blanc about what his thoughts on Twitter and its positive role in the aftermath of the Haiti disaster were, Duncan turned out not to be such a big fan of Twitter after all.

    Here is what I think Duncan should do to do to get more out of Twitter:

    1. Use TweetDeck (my favourite) or Seesmic (using it on Android since TweetDeck is not available and it’s very good indeed) to separate different streams into columns: “All Friends”, “Direct Messages”, “Mentions”. In TweetDeck, you can also add your Facebook column.

    2. If you like Finance, Trading and Investments,
    – register for StockTwits
    – download the Nasdaq QFolio app for the iPhone in the App store and follow what people are saying on StockTwits for each ticker.

    3. Follow people of interest, those with expertise and breaking news, through search or pre-existing lists on other people’s profiles or on TweetDeck’s homepage. e.g. Follow @howardlinzon, and @fredwilson

    Here is why I think Twitter is important:

    1. Nasdaq has built an iPhone app which leverages StockTwits, which itself leverages Twitter. I bet this is going to be important for algorithmic trading.

    2. Twitter has made deals with Google and Microsoft to the tune of $25M so that their realtime search results appear in the two giants’ traditional search engines

    3. Twitter has an ecosystem of 50,000 apps, and growing. It has become a platform where people use it for marketing and finance. This is crucial and there area many other details in my criteria for IPO selection in Two IPOs to look forward to in 2010.

    4. Remember IRC channels during the Iraq war? Twitter plays that role today, and much more. Breakout news happens there first, and much later on other channels.

    5. I was spending some night in New York and at one point in time there were insistent traffic of fire-trucks and I thought “This is not the city that never sleeps – it’s rather the city where you can never sleep”. My first reflex? Checking #NYC on Twitter to see if there was any danger in the vicinity. Similarly, Twitter will become essential for alerting you to any opportunities in your surroundings. That’s part of the power of real-time and location-based services.

    6. Twitter allows you to do social computing. Your trusted friends and contacts will help when you have a genuine question and if you are helpful too.

    7. Last but not least… Dell made $6.5M through Twitter channels sales in two years.

    Solar

    I was a bit disappointed to hear that solar would have some difficulties along the 2010 because of a supply glut. However, stumbling blocks can turn into stepping stones – this may be an opportunity to regularly stock up on the equities, value-averaging along the way until the big break provided the choice is made carefully.

    How Deloitte leveraged Social Media for TMT Predictions 2010

    Deloitte did very well in leveraging Social Media prior and up to the event. First, they decided to open up submissions from the public, leveraging user-generated content.

    They further leveraged several social media applications, services and strategies and Katheline Jean-Pierre has been a driving force behind that, and I actually learned about the MyTMT prediction through her Facebook and Twitter feeds.

    Deloitte was present on the Web, on Twitter, and on Facebook, together with UStream, YouTube etc…

    Deloitte called upon Laurent Maisonnave of ZeAgence to build upon his social media and video streaming skills – the event was filmed and streamed to Deloitte’s UStream channel in realtime over the web.

    They leveraged the Wildfire application for Facebook, which allows campaign management. Any participant could upload their videos and then invite their Facebook friends to vote through the Wildfire app embedded in Deloitte’s MyTMT web page.

    Before and during the event, Deloitte had communicated and prominently displayed its hashtag for the event (#TMTPrediction2010 or #TMTPred2010) for others to include in their Tweets.

    This morning, I was also flabbergasted to learn that my prediction was shown to 400 Business people at the event in Toronto.

    Actually, it will also be shown throughout Canada during Deloitte’s stops in major cities during their TMT Prediction events. I believe they are:
    Winnipeg, Quebec, Ottawa, Calgary, Halifax and Vancouver.

    Thanks Deloitte for this opportunity and kudos to the team, Duncan, Robert, Peter, Katheline, Laurent and the Jury members.

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    Google’s decision to significantly review the need for operations in China following recent attacks has many implications.

    A string of attacks on about 30 major US companies through Adobe (Acrobat) and Microsoft (Internet Explorer 6 up to 8 on Windows up to Windows 7) products made Google question the censorship in China. Google opened its search filters to remove any censorship as well as mentioned that even the whole operations in China could be closed. This sent the stock back below the $600 level and opens the market for more Baidu domination, their main competitor there.

    This got me thinking about values and why Google did not originally stick to them. In any relationship, business or otherwise, shared values are strong foundations to build a lasting and fruitful relationship.

    I am also reminded of other restrictions imposed in China based on a conversation with my good friend Ronan Jezequel who is based at Nokia there. I couldn’t share a Tweet with him because Twitter is blocked in China.

    More reads:

    Ars Technica – Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack

    McAfee Security Insights Blog – Operation Aurora hits Google, others

    Ars Technica – Microsoft warns of IE bug used in Chinese attacks on Google

    ComputerWorld – Hackers used rigged PDFs to hit Google and Adobe

    Bloomberg – Yahoo said to be target of Hackers in China

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    These are some of the best Finance, Investment and Trading books in my library.

    Useful for a last-minute gift for yourself or your loved ones.

    Merry Christmas!

    1. Lords of Finance – Liaquat Ahamed

    Liaquat Ahamed won the Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award 2009 for it but it’s about the Great Depression and the Crash of 1929.

    2. One Up On Wall Street – Peter Lynch

    How to spot the next ten-bagger.

    3. Inside the House of Money – Steven Drobny

    Macro-thinking. Interviews with top Hedge Fund Managers.

    4. The Warren Buffet Way – Hagstrom, Fisher, Miller

    Essentials of Value investing according to Buffett, with nods to Fisher & Graham.

    5. The Greatest Trade Ever – Gregory Zuckerman

    How John Paulson cemented his place as one of the greatest traders/hedge fund managers ever.

    6. Trend Following – Michael Covel

    All types of Trend-following information, including from the cryptic but highly successful Ed Seykota.

    7. Way of the Turtle – Curtis Faith

    Are traders born or bred? This question led to an experiment which is documented here. Hugely interesting.

    8. Trade your way to financial freedom – Van Tharp

    Describes criteria for a complete trading plan. Also speaks about Psychology.

    9. Come into my trading room – Dr. Alexander Elder

    Complete trading plan, with examples.

    10. Trading for a living – Alexander Elder

    11. Reminiscences of a stock operator – Edwin Lefèvre

    Life of the legendary Jesse Livermore.

    12. How I made $2,000,000 in the stock market – Nicolas Darvas

    How Darvas, a dancer, approached the stock market from scratch and evolved a mix of fundamental and technical perspectives. Highly entertaining and educational.

    13. Quantitative Trading – Ernie Chan

    14. Generate Thousands in Cash on your Stocks Before Buying or Selling Them – Samir Elias

    15. The Lazy Investor – Derek Foster

    For the long, value and dividend approach with compounding. For investors, not traders.

    16. An American Hedge-Fund – Timothy Sykes

    How Tim made a fortune out of his bar mitzvah money, $12,500 and then proceeded to lose all of it. More importantly, how Tim dusted himself up again to do it one more time starting with the exact same amount of money. This time, however, he’s doing it in the open, documenting winning and losing trades through Covestor. He rules the penny stocks space. Follow him on his blog, on Covestor, on Twitter, Facebook, Livestream, etc… – he’s everywhere.

    17. Investing The Templeton Way – Lauren Templeton, Scott Phillips

    18. Market Wizards – Jack Schwager

    19. Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets – John Murphy

    20. Japanese Candlestick Charting Patterns – Steve Nison

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    In the spirit of doing a retrospective of the decade, here are the Top 9 Businessmen, Technologists / Business Technologists of the 2000s according to me (the order is not that important, except for the Google people)

    1. Sergey BrinLarry PageGoogle

    • For showing how pure IQ can build fantastic technologies and businesses
    • For valuing Engineering and Engineers
    • For making this decade exciting again relative to Technology, Business and the World
    • For making the world less Microsoft
    • For hiring Eric Schmidt
    • For contributing so much to open-source
    • For giving away so many free but incredibly useful technologies

    2. Eric SchmidtGoogle

    • For showing how the suits can mingle very well with the geeks and make their grand plans scale as a business. (Well, Schmidt is also an Engineer)
    • For understanding the Geeks

    3. Richard BransonVirgin

    • For taking people out to space. Amazing inspiration throughout.

    4. Mark ShuttleworthCanonical / Ubuntu

    • For delivering CDs and DVDs of an open-source Operating System based on GNU/Linux for free worldwide
    • For making a very impressive GNU/Linux distribution

    5. Jack Dorsey, Evan Williams, Biz StoneTwitter

    • For making a small idea in which I didn’t believe in initially into a potential heavyweight IPO to look forward to.

    6. Steve JobsApple

    • For showing the results of the most amazing come-back as a CEO ever
    • For one of the most inspiring speeches ever – “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish”
    • For making Apple mass-market multi-touch touch-screen technology
    • For making the world less Microsoft

    7. Gary VaynerchukWine Library tv

    • For being such a good representation of living your passion
    • For crushing it regularly
    • For the book showing the story of how an immigrant crushes it
    • For the Thunder Show, aka The Internet’s most passionate wine program
    • For the amazing Wine recommendations

    8. Timothy Sykes

    • For falling and getting straight back up and building even more business around the story

    And if only there had been no story of idea stealing:

    Mark ZuckerbergFacebook

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    Bloomberg reported that Twitter inked two deals for a total of 25M USD with Google and Microsoft so that tweets can be inserted in their search results page.

    This shows how essential real-time has become on the Web.

    For me it’s a big win for the underlying open source technology framework for Rapid Web Development, Ruby on Rails, which I have been recommending to enterprises since about 4 years ago.

    Where are you on the Technology Adoption Lifecycle below regarding Ruby and Ruby on Rails? Have you innovated? Are you an early adopter because you understand the business implications, or will you be at the other end of the spectrum, a laggard?

    Technology Adoption Lifecycle

    Technology Adoption Lifecycle

    The news is, however, huge for Twitter, which is said by Bloomberg to be profitable now.

    Twitter has become a platform essential to the Web in Marketing/Advertising, Customer Care (though less as people understand this less) but also in Finance. Witness Howard Linzon’s StockTwits, itself leveraged by NASDAQ’s Portfolio Manager application for the iPhone.

    It’s huge news because the real-time web can be input signals into high-frequency trading strategies.

    If Twitter does an IPO, I won’t miss it.

    • Share/Bookmark
    0
    Digg me


    TMT contest

    This past week-end was abuzz with the internal release to employees of the Google Phone, Nexus One. Although manufactured by HTC, it is going to be branded Google.

    For me, the implications are staggering as Google subsidizes many of its applications because 95%+ (some say 99%) of its revenues come from highly-targeted advertising and it’s one more step in a full-blown Mobile Telecom service offering from Google.

    I was therefore divided between either writing a new blog post about analysis and the significance of it or making the gist of the argument for a short presentation so as to participate and stimulate the Deloitte Canada MyTMT Predictions 2010. I ended up doing the latter.

    You can find my TMT prediction for 2010 and vote for it once per day on the Deloitte/Wildfire Facebook application here: “Google ad-subsidized Telecom”

    Katheline Jean-Pierre (Web Marketing Strategist at Deloitte Canada) and Laurent Maisonnave (Social Media and Web Video Marketing specialist, as well as President of “Île-Sans-Fil” which provides free wireless in Montreal) both mention my entries on their respective blogs (the content is in French).

    I couldn’t find any extensive analysis on the web during this week-end, except this one on the Forrester Blog for Consumer Product Strategy Professionals by Charles S. Golvin. Golvin asks a good question about the financing as most handsets are sold lower because of the accompanying plan:

    Will the phone be sold at full retail price, or will it be subsidized?

    However, my own interest is in:

      - whether Google’s positioning will morph into a full-fledged Telecom service
      - whether it will be significantly based on widespread Wi-Fi and WiMAX capability so that the possibility of free calls worldwide can be explored
      - to what extent this service will be subsidized by ads

    In other words, that the significance of the Google Nexus One phone goes beyond the release of a phone, unlocked, directly to the end customer, “upending the carrier model”.

    The value lies in what is beyond:

    Massive Disruption of the Telecom Industry.

    As opposed to Golvin, I have no doubt there will be some form of subsidy for the Telco service – they’re doing it right now with Google Voice with rates lower than Skype. I do believe that Golvin’s scenario about subsidizing the handset is plausible too as they need to position it firmly against the iPhone. Actually, I wrote about Google’s strategy for Telecom before in 2007 in “Google Telecom, Hello” here on YashLabs.

    Also, an earlier analysis of Google as a company and why I like them is here: “The essence of Google’s success”. In this analysis, also from 2007, is why I believe that some form of subsidization by ads is inevitable – it is Google’s lifeblood as a business.

    Even the Crown Jewel in Google’s Technology Portfolio, PageRank, is offered to the masses for free when you are searching thanks to ads.

    “They forget the massive revenues from contextualized highly-targeted ads and they don’t understand that all problem-solving is some type of search.”

    I LOVE that line!!!

    Best

    Hugh (Hugh McLeod of Gaping Void)

    What are your TMT predictions for 2010? Participate in the contest. Looking forward to seeing your take.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
    0
    Digg me

    Intel’s graphics chip

    Intel (INTC) had planned to launch a GPGPU chip codenamed Larrabee, but ended up back-pedalling. The plan was to leverage the existing Intel x86 processor architecture in a double-core configuration.

    On Bloggingstocks, the problem seems to be “product quality issues during the development stage“.

    I think it’s rather because a CPU and a GPU are two very different beasts, which prompted AMD to buy ATI rather than to rely on their existing knowledge, platform, architecture and technology.

    Case in point: the appearance of Apple’s OpenCL technologies which leverage both multiple processors and Graphics Processing Units for computing.

    Check out this short video in 2008 from the NVDIA CEO about Larrabee.

    NVDIA and AMD surged on the news. I believe somebody did very well at AMD in 2006 by deciding to acquire ATI.

    All this makes yesterday’s post and especially the StreetInsider article on why Intel should buy ARMH that much more prescient.

    AMD appears to be a good hedge for INTC holders.

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    Trading horizon

    I nearly covered a shorting position with a limit today but cancelled it. The day was good and my portfolio is up 53.7%. One of the short positions is now top on the list in terms of dollar gain, though not percentage gain.

    Shorting and trading, by their very nature are shorter-term positions as compared to investments. It is quite difficult to be able to hold on to a shorting position for a few days. For some traders it can be a nerve-wracking experience, especially if the threat of a short squeeze looms, where the potential for losses is unlimited. Therefore, level-headedness is of the essence.

    The trade must be well-researched, and requisites for a good trade must be fulfilled: entry, exit, % of bankroll risked, stops or limits.

    I believe you should forget about a short trade which was profitable when covered in the following sense: “You should have no regret about any other action which could have brought more profits.”

    This said, it is important to have a trading journal where trades can be stored and analyzed.

    Value Investing

    Buy-and-hold and regular investing with DRIP can bring some peace of mind to the Trader/Investor, but in some market conditions it can be much more nerve-wracking than holding on a short.

    Consider Buffett seeing his portfolio literally melt by $25 billion during the global economic crisis and still keeping at it. There is simply no way that he could not be affected by this stupendous loss unless he really doesn’t look at his portfolio at all.

    In addition, it was possible as I showed in this blog to call the massive losses in the market months before October 2008. With such a large exposure to market and systemic risk, one could have cashed in, or done like Paulson and make the Greatest Trade Ever – as it is, the title of a new book by Gregory Zuckerman:

    Trend-following

    My thoughts on trend-following are related to the amplification effect of people using this strategy. Moreover, these strategies can also be set and triggered in an automated way.

    With the tendency to go more towards automation, thus removing the deleterious effects of human emotions on trading, I can only foresee that similar strategies and systems will cause charts to spike one way or the other, with the amplitudes getting higher with time.

    It would be interesting to model these changes, and build meta-strategies to profit from these trends.

    A book I recommend on Trend Following is the one by Michael Covel:

    • Share/Bookmark
    0
    Digg me

    Although the day was thrilling, last night’s post-market reaction to a lawsuit filed against NetList brought the stock down much more than during the day.

    I could see this on Google Finance, which shows the day price, and right underneath it the post-market trading price, as opposed to Yahoo Finance, which shows the post-market information below the chart.

    Netlist was therefore down during the day about %7, and and additional -25% between 7-8 p.m. Tim Sykes has an extensive report about the company on his blog, coming from his newly launched PUMP research service where he describes how the litigation risk for this company was predicted two weeks ago by his team. Quite impressive.

    Which brought me to do a quick comparison of three trading styles a year after I started:

    • Value investing. Or in my case, just being long on certain equities as I haven’t yet done any extensive fundamental analysis. I still hedged any stock position with Gold and Silver.
    • Regular investing with DRIP (Dividend Re-investment Plan)
    • Penny-stocking

    The penny-stocking result on just two short positions these past two weeks have contributed sufficiently to my trading account for the importance of this trading style to re-affirmed in my view. They contributed to 27% of my trading account (Value investing + Penny-stocking – DRIP), which means the rate of return is quite high indeed.

    My portfolio is up 50%.

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    Dubai default threat

    The news about Dubai, namely that Dubai World has asked to postponed debt payment, has rippled through to the US stock market already. This comes at a time where the US markets are taking some time out for Thanksgiving. Markets were closed on Thursday, but the half-day trading on Friday offered a glimpse of red.

    European banks like RBS and HSBC are the most exposed to the Dubai debt, but the fear of repercussions worldwide and especially in the US has created yet another setback this Friday, with some saying it is a well-deserved market correction. Stocks were all in the red. By resonance, the financial sector was impacted. I think this could make for some opportunities to buy longer-term investments.

    Chinese stock – Origin Agritech (SEED)

    Tim Sykes, who is a most astonishing new figure in trading and who is up > 650% since November 2007 actually made one of his worst trades this past week on Origin Agritech (SEED). It so happens that I am long on this stock since a few months ago. I was battered by my choices of Chinese stocks and gradually discarded them except this one.

    This past week, on the announcement that SEED had received government approval for a new GMO product, the equity price was sent soaring, much to my delight. Whether this trend upwards can be sustained remains to be seen. I am tempted to cash in the profits and re-balance my portfolio which has help up about +30% monthly since October 2008 – yes, probably the worst time to invest in the US markets ever. My investment pool was a learning budget, so for me it could go to zero without any material cost to me as it’s normal to pay for education.

    The thing is, before the economic meltdown in October 2008, SEED was not a penny stock. This raises the question as to whether Tim’s strategy for penny-stocking has to take into account the market conditions and the company’s bull market price history too.

    On Trading Style

    Ideally, I wanted to be able to explore all types of trading and investment styles, like being long on value stocks, à la Buffett, or trading the trend and shorter-term à la Turtle or à la Tim Sykes. However, I found that it is not easy to juggle the very different required mindsets. For one, although after research I was convinced that the Chinese stocks I had invested in were good long-term (FEED, GRO, PUDC), I felt on edge seeing that they were not yielding their promises yet and had to divest.

    This probably means that I’m more interested in shorter-term profits. Yet I am not a day-trader. It is probable that a good time-frame for me is from a few days (e.g. when I’m shorting and more on this below) and a few months.

    DRIPs

    On the other hand, I also recently received a huge envelope in the mail. It was actually a number of shares in the previous company I worked at, in the Finance sector. Never mind that the boss of this department serving the financial sector (including big and institutional firms like Bank of America, PNC financials, New York Mellon), was utterly clueless when it comes to the fundamentals in the very industry he was (and probably still is) working in and that he couldn’t see the meltdown coming until way past the Lehman collapse whereas I called it before March 2008.

    The company was paying up to half my share purchase from my salary, and I had devoted the maximum percentage allowed, which if I remember correctly was 20%. This was in an automatic dividend reinvestment account. In the meantime, the stock was up from 9ish to 13ish on the economic recovery and some positive news (the company in question is really good at pumping out PRs, but is also soundly managed financially). The regularly investment and re-investment now amounts to a hefty non-taxable sum.

    Hence, the notion of regular investment with a DRIP (Dividend Re-Investment Plan) is immensely interesting: the power of compound interest – Buffet built his fortune on it. But more important, I have seen what it does, with a hard, tangible year-long investment and its current valuation.

    Netlist (NLST)

    Speaking of shorting, through Tim Sykes I heard of Netlist, a company selling memory modules called HyperCloud. This stock has shot up in a few days and this time it has no history of anything else than a penny stock. Therefore, I expect this to crash. It didn’t want to last week, but Dubai made it crack a little. It’s probably always a good thing to wait for any short squeezes to play out before sending a short order.

    The “USD-USD market” strong coupling

    Everything in the US markets goes this way these days: Markets are up as the USD is down, Markets are down as the USD is up. There seems to be a strong correlation or coupling as some analysts and pundits are saying. However, this view strikes me as odd if not downright silly as the valuation itself is in a declining currency as all FIAT currencies are bound to devaluate.

    Maybe my USD earnings on my portfolio are not that good after all and it’s the right time to invest in those Canadian Dividend Aristocrats.

    We will have to wait till tomorrow to see how the Dubai effect plays out.

    • Share/Bookmark
    Tagged with:
     
    0
    Digg me

    Last week, Wall Street crashed and seemingly soared in the end but my portfolio simulation shot up 17% in 3 days. In boxes below were the trading decisions based on the news to make this happen.

    Finviz week map

    At least Wall Street seemed to be heading down the drain as the past two weeks have been a roller-coaster of a ride for the stock markets. A mixture of fear, trepidation and panic had spread through the U.S. stock market, contaminating foreign markets as well, to the extent that Russia had to close its own.

    Called a financial meltdown and the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, all this messy outcome was predicted by Nouriel Roubini (and others) since 2006 and before. I wrote about Roubini here in March 2008, but he was only profiled in the New York Times magazine in mid-August this year.

    Reuters has a good description of the timeline from Friday September 12th onward

    Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch

    In just a few days, we saw Lehman Brothers‘ stock price plunge into oblivion. Faced with a cold shoulder from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, the only hope would have come from another Wall Street company. None moved as nobody wanted to take additional toxic financial instruments (derivatives and bad debts anyone? Warren Buffett called derivatives “financial weapons of mass destruction” in 2003) while the Libor shot up and banks mistrust of each other nearly halted the wheels of capitalism (interbank lending). The outcries against the Fed and the Treasury for bailing out companies which ultimately would have burdened taxpayers must have had some effect.

    Talks with Korea Development Bank had amount to nothing for Lehman…

    Trade: short Lehman

    Bail outs

    However, one cannot say either the Fed or the Treasury have been consistent:

    • Bear Stearns – bailed out
    • Fannie Mae – bailed out (normal)
    • Freddie Mac – bailed out (normal)
    • Lehman – no bail out
    • A.I.G. – Stress, Fear, Panic, Headlines, stock plunge, talks…bailed out

    Reuters has a special coverage of the credit crisis with a graphical representation of the bail-out timeline for this year.

    Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley

    During the same week-end that Lehman filed for Bankruptcy, Merrill scrambled to sell itself to Bank of America. At this point, many observers had started to speculate on which big bank would be next, probably echoing Nouriel Roubini’s initial analysis. In fact, some pointed out that the very business model of the broker-dealer was fundamentally flawed and that the two remaining big investment banks, Goldman Sachs (GS) as well as Morgan Stanley (MS) would have to find partners (possibly in commercial banks) to stay afloat.

    Despite prompt statements from both GS and MS as to their good standing, their stock quotes plunged… and kept plunging. GS went from $140 a share to sub-$100 levels for a short time. MS fell from $30 to sub-$12 levels.

    Trade: short Goldman Sachs, short Morgan Stanley. With the profits from the cover, buy Arch Coal, Potash, Barrick Gold for the long run

    The short-seller witch-hunt

    On Thursday, the U.K. bans all short-selling. The next day, the U.S. follow suit.

    Of course, according to the regulators, it must be the fault of those short sellers, naked or not, those secretive Hedge Funds and not the fault of the people who lied when selling derivatives and bad debts.

    Paul Kedrosky shoots this argument down with a few figures.

    Privatization of profits and socialization of losses – the mother of all bail-outs

    The Treasury announces a 700-billion bail-out plan and advocates creating a new entity to absorb all the toxic instruments and bad debts that financial institutions carry. Well, actually the Fed will print the money (indexed on nothing – the Dollar will crash and gold will rise) and sell it to the government. Ultimately, it will be the tax-payer who will foot the bill and the interests.

    This is why, as Roubini and others observed, the profits are privatized and go to a select few, but all the mistakes and losses are socializedpropagated to the tax-payers.

    To quote Roubini:

    First, note that the Fed and the Treasury claimed to draw a line in the sand on moral hazard with their decision not to bail out Lehman ; but two days later the financial tsunami of the century wiped out that line and led to the continuation of the mother of all moral hazard bailouts with the nationalization of AIG.

    Roger Ehrenberg echoes this view on Seeking Alpha.

    From Reuters:

    Friday Sept 19:
    - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issues an emergency order temporarily banning short-selling in shares of about 799 financial institutions to calm the financial markets. The measure is set to end on October 2, but can be extended for an additional 10 days;
    - The FTSE rises 8.8 percent, its biggest surge ever;
    - Market watchdogs in France, Portugal and Ireland take similar steps to crack down on short-selling.

    Saturday, Sept 20:
    - The Bush administration proposes a $700 billion bailout of financial markets crippled by the crisis. The legislation would give the Treasury Department authority to buy a wide range of illiquid assets from banks, but specifics of the proposal remain unclear and subject to negotiation.

    Around the world, headlines read: “Markets ’soar’”

    Trade: buy Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, UBS.
    Result: from -7.14% to +9.85%, i.e. +17% in 3 days. However, this market is highly volatile, and fear-based. Anything can happen.

    • Share/Bookmark